3 ms·
Oh, of course, that's the most charitable interpretation. Usaglig.
by Tadpole9181 2y ago
Oh, of course, that's the most charitable interpretation. Usaglig.
- A_D_E_P_T 2y agoWhat would you suggest is simultaneously more charitable and at the same time reasonable and well-considered? I don't think that there is such a position. If climate change is the bureaucrats' true concern, there are many better ways to combat it, and many of those ways aren't taxes on the population. In fact, it's quite unreasonable to suggest that anything Denmark does, in itself, can affect the world's climate situation. The only thing Denmark can do is provide the world with a positive example. This ain't it -- with rising cost-of-living concerns around the world, it's very much a step in the wrong direction.