3 ms·

I don't think anyone is arguing in favour of bribes for either local or federal officers - just that this particular ruling is not related (directly/legally) to

by patmcc 2y ago

I don't think anyone is arguing in favour of bribes for either local or federal officers - just that this particular ruling is not related (directly/legally) to the actions of the Supreme Court justices themselves.

Hasu 2y ago
> I don't think anyone is arguing in favour of bribes for either local or federal officers Not here, but six Supreme Court Justices have done exactly that.