2 ms·
Strictly speaking, the word "only" isn't in the original title. I listed two title snippets, said which was from the article, and said one was from here. That
by b112 2y ago
Strictly speaking, the word "only" isn't in the original title.
I listed two title snippets, said which was from the article, and said one was from here. That's exceptionally clear.
From what I replied to:
Well, ok, hotels are more expensive now, but are houses and long term rentals any cheaper? Was the ban successful at improving housing affordability for the people who live there?
These questions are answered, as I specifed, by the title.
You.may not like the lack of detail, but that was not the criticism I responded to.
The title says "no, not cheaper".
- morsch 2y agoThat is what the article's author seems to think, but they give zero evidence for it. The criticism you responded to was The article doesn't seem to discuss that at all. -- and it doesn't. All it does is concede ignorance on the topic.
- b112 2y agoBut it does discuss it, it says "No". OP would have been more prudent, if that was the real question, to say "Provides no evidence". It's OK for an article to focus on one thing, in this case, hotel pricing.