2 ms·
By giving an European example, you are actually proving my point. Just read this https://fooledbyrandomness.com/ConvexityScience.pdf https://fooledbyrandomness
by zooq_ai 2y ago
By giving an European example, you are actually proving my point.
Just read this https://fooledbyrandomness.com/ConvexityScience.pdf https://fooledbyrandomness.com/ConvexityScience.pdf
From fig (1)
Waymo/ HNers : Knowledge Edge
Musk : Convexity Bias
That's why Musk's approach will win. Waymo will no doubt provide a safe, rule-following driving experience, but Tesla will have frontier breakthroughs and provide more human-like, adapting and sufficiently aggressive driving experience
- ddalex 2y agoThe problem with Tesla's approach is that it learns from humans. Specifically, it learns the mediocrity of humans. That's why it made that idiotic manoeuvre, it learned it from the typical people that drive other Teslas. So Tesla will necessarily converge to the performance of your average driver, because that's where the data leads it. Waymo's is developing a new type of understanding and modelling of the world. It perceives and tracks items above the capability of humans to track and understand. Therefore its limits are outside of the bounds of the most capable human drivers. Your own argument highlights exactly why Tesla's approach is a dead end (exactly in the same manners that LLMs will lead to the dead internet), while Waymo's approach will likely generate super-intelligence.