4 ms·
I'm sure cutting 20 BILLION in funding from them in the IRA isn't going to fuck over any of their internal processes or hiring
by cchance 2y ago
I'm sure cutting 20 BILLION in funding from them in the IRA isn't going to fuck over any of their internal processes or hiring
- lostdog 2y agoThe IRA started out adding $80b to IRS funding, and Republicans negotiated it down to $60b.
- throwaway48476 2y agoAs I recall the Republicans tried to add an ammendment that the $60b would only be used to target >$400k income but the democrats rejected it.
- lostdog 2y agoIs there a source, or is this made up?
- azemetre 2y agoA good rule of thumb is that if they didn’t include a source there likely isn’t one.
- throwaway48476 2y agohttps://thehill.com/policy/3594879-gop-rails-against-irs-funding-in-inflation-reduction-act/ https://thehill.com/policy/3594879-gop-rails-against-irs-fun... No need to be so cynical.
- throwaway48476 2y agohttps://thehill.com/policy/3594879-gop-rails-against-irs-funding-in-inflation-reduction-act/ https://thehill.com/policy/3594879-gop-rails-against-irs-fun... >During the extended voting session of the Senate that lasted well into Sunday, Crapo unsuccessfully filed an amendment to the bill to explicitly prevent the IRS from using the additional enforcement funding on taxpayers who earn less than $400,000 per year. >While the amendment was shot down by Democrats in the Senate,
- Facemelters 2y agohow do you know this number but not understand the IRA increased IRS funding
- psunavy03 2y agoCertain political cultists are desperate to have their priors confirmed, while simultaneously believing that the only people desperate to have their priors confirmed are members of the opposing political cult. (this is a bipartisan phenomenon, FWIW)