2 ms·
It’s a ruling against the injunction, not a ruling on the merits of the case.
by chatmasta 2y ago
It’s a ruling against the injunction, not a ruling on the merits of the case.
- lesuorac 2y agoAnd the injunction prohibited the USG from talking to Social Medial Companies. This ruling removes the injunction, Therefore, SCOTUS rules that USG can talk to Social Media Companies.
- otterley 2y agoThat's not how lawyers think about this, and since this is a legal case, if they don't, neither should the rest of us.
- lesuorac 2y agoWe're talking about the headline of a news article. The standard shouldn't be what would a lawyer claim. I would claim a lay-person would say that removing a limitation from doing X could be stated as allowing X.
- otterley 2y agoThe WSJ's headline is much better and not misleading: "Supreme Court Rejects GOP-Led Suit Claiming Government Censored Social Media".