> What? That totally isn't true. That's literally true. There's even a word for it: Aufstocken. Are you saying Bürgergeld is too high? That the standard of a

> What? That totally isn't true. That's literally true. There's even a word for it: Aufstocken. Are you saying Bürgergeld is too high? That the standard of a living wage should be lower than Bürgergeld currently is? How do you define a "living wage" then? You say minimum wage is (too?) high, taxes are "drastically" too high and social spending is "drastically" too high. What does that mean? What tax rates per bracket would you find acceptable? How much lower should Bürgeld be or which group of current recipients should be excluded from it? Or what other social welfare programmes are you thinking of that should be cut? It's easy to say that "social spending" is too high if you look at a context-free aggregate value. But what do you actually envision when you say that you think it should be "drastically" cut?