3 ms·
We've recently begun to move our entire infrastructure to external providers (vps and cloud) because we felt that we couldn't guarantee a sufficiently high leve
by kitsune_ 14y ago
We've recently begun to move our entire infrastructure to external providers (vps and cloud) because we felt that we couldn't guarantee a sufficiently high level of quality and had to devote too much time and money to operations.
In over four months we've probably already had more downtime than in the past 5 years. Despite paying quite a lot for "redundant", clustered offerings. There was one nasty bug in the hypervisor that killed the entirety of one of our providers' vps infrastructure - for over a day.
Our experience with "the cloud" was a little bit better, but we aren't entirely satisfied.
I don't know, maybe we should just order services from three different providers mirror our applications ourselves as a fail-over mechanism.
- dholowiski 14y ago> maybe we should just order services from three different providers mirror our applications ourselves as a fail-over mechanism. Yes, yes a thousand times yes. And dedicated servers don't cost much more than VPS's.
- patrickgzill 14y agoYes. I recommend having a look at either ProxMox (proxmox.com) which can simultaneously do OpenVZ and KVM; or, XCP for Xen-based stuff - see http://www.xen.org/products/cloudxen.html http://www.xen.org/products/cloudxen.html
- neilmiddleton 14y agoHeroku status is currently showing production uptime as 99.97%. That's not too shabby, and definitely not as bad as you make out.
- jsprinkles 14y agoHe implied that Heroku is not his sole provider. I'm skeptical of that figure, too, as it's probably something on the Heroku sales site (99.7% to the 30-byte health check!), or it's manually updated, in which case it's probably rounded.
- cardmagic 14y agohttp://AppFog.com http://AppFog.com has ruby, python and node, multiple regions today: Ireland, Singapore and US, adding Rackspace and HP soon. All free and backed by CloudFoundry