If we could get away.from climaye denial, we would have.more interesting/productive discussions. The problem with climate denialism is "honest" attempts at eva

If we could get away.from climaye denial, we would have.more interesting/productive discussions. The problem with climate denialism is "honest" attempts at evaluating claims tries to "both sides" the logic and the available data, but there isn't another side to climate change. And trying to incorporate denialism makes your rational decisions wrong. Climate change is a singularity that has been passed. We're not going back to the way the climate was 100 years ago. So, the real question is, how does 100$ per cow remediate the damage of trillions of dollars over the next century. I've got no idea, but it's definitely not nothing.