4 ms·
Generally yes. I am not sure how UI works (which of course entitles me to spout my opinion), but a system where it draws from a pool based off work history cou
by madamelic 2y ago
Generally yes.
I am not sure how UI works (which of course entitles me to spout my opinion), but a system where it draws from a pool based off work history could be the middle ground solution.
If they are going to base your unemployment on your past pay, they might as well also base it on your past history.
To get to my point: if you work for a long period then quit / fired, you should have a bigger pool you can tap into for any reason. If you work for short periods then quit, you should have a smaller pool which trends to near-zero if you never stay at a place for long. If you work for short periods then get laid off, you should have the standard pool (ie: you shouldn't be unfairly punished through no fault of your own besides maybe being unlucky / bad at picking jobs).
I am paying into it regardless, I should be able to choose to be able to tap into it.
It disincentives people jumping on and off UI constantly on their own free-will but it gives a cushion to those who are burnt or needing to transition to a new field.
- trosi 2y agoI don't know how it works in the US (and I assume it might be different state by state), but in many countries in Europe this is already the case. For example: if you get fired today you are entitled to a benefit if you have worked at least X months out of the last Y months. X and Y must be chosen carefully of course.
- dbspin 2y agoHard disagree - your entitlement should be based on need, not social status. So your previous employment shouldn't factor in at all.