3 ms·
the problem is that EU basically wants Teams to be more expensive so that Slack will become cheaper and thus more attractive. It is hilarious that Slack still
by chucke1992 2y ago
the problem is that EU basically wants Teams to be more expensive so that Slack will become cheaper and thus more attractive.
It is hilarious that Slack still has not been able to introduce proper video calls while introducing relatively useless integrations.
- mrweasel 2y agoIf Microsoft unbundles Teams, they can still make it available for free and nothing will have been resolved. I do agree with the EU that Teams should be unbundled, but unless you have a cheaper and/or better alternative I don't see it being all that effective. Teams also integrate into Active Directory and the whole Microsoft ecosystem in a way most other systems just doesn't do (not that they can't).
- chucke1992 2y agoTeams currently requires a separate license no? It is not free anymore with Microsoft 365. And that's thing - if slack was actually trying to add features and integrations that users actually wanted, it would not fail that much. I mean, Zoom succeeded without having anything except team conferencing...
- mirsadm 2y agoWhat are proper video calls? I can make video calls just fine in Slack.