3 ms·
Again, another claim that a brain or AGI is required to drive a car. Does anyone have any research to cite that establishes this seemingly known fact?
by bangaladore 2y ago
Again, another claim that a brain or AGI is required to drive a car. Does anyone have any research to cite that establishes this seemingly known fact?
- mlyle 2y agoI am not sure that the vision in Teslas is adequate with -any- amount of processing to drive a car. Spatial resolution is limited, as is seeing distant vehicles during merges, etc. Secondarily, there is no guarantee that the amount of processing is enough, because the extant human systems use much more. “Cheating” by using more sensors to simplify out complexities and to cover for the shortcomings of other sensors in the suite seems wise.
- kajecounterhack 2y ago> “Cheating” by using more sensors to simplify out complexities and to cover for the shortcomings of other sensors in the suite seems wise. Also, "cheating" is just a necessary step to build baseline metrics. You need ground truth. It may very well be the case that cheating is needed to generate the training data necessary to stop cheating...someday.