4 ms·
The "Teams (new)" is absurd. Have we not learned not to name things this way by now? I say this as someone as guilty as anyone of having created an iterative se
by RankingMember 2y ago
The "Teams (new)" is absurd. Have we not learned not to name things this way by now? I say this as someone as guilty as anyone of having created an iterative series of files with "Final_1.txt", "Final_2.txt", "Final_1-new.txt" suffixes in times of mental sketch-padding. I would never release a product into the wild with any of those in the title, though.
- sdwr 2y ago"Teams v2 final final (real) skdhajah.exe"
- bzzzt 2y agoI’m waiting for Super Teams 2 turbo :)
- Sakos 2y agoTbh, I prefer the Teams (new) and Teams (classic) naming. It's infinitely better than the naming they were doing before, which is they were named the exact same in the menu, but were entirely different versions.
- j5155 2y agoWhy can’t it just be Teams v2 and Teams v1?