> why they might have. They had untracked access to what are essentially bank accounts. No one has said it out loud but the implication is theft. The other pos

> why they might have. They had untracked access to what are essentially bank accounts. No one has said it out loud but the implication is theft. The other possibility is that they were desperately trying to cover up faults - when subpostmasters reported bugged transactions sometimes it would get silently 'fixed' remotely.