4 ms·
This point jumped out to me as a pretty significant limitation of the study. The investigators did not collect any data on xylitol intake from their human co
by 0cf8612b2e1e 2y ago
This point jumped out to me as a pretty significant limitation of the study.
The investigators did not collect any data on xylitol intake from their human cohort, so we have no way of correlating consumption with MACE risk because we have no way of knowing which participants were regularly consuming xylitol-containing foods. And although xylitol is currently a very common sweetening additive, Witkowski et al. note that the majority of their study participants were enrolled prior to xylitol’s widespread use, suggesting that circulating levels measured in their observational cohort may not be attributable to dietary intake.
Alas, as with all human nutrition studies, it is all garbage and mostly funded by Nestle or similar.
- mattmaroon 2y agoConvincing garbage too. I routinely have an argument with a friend who believes these, and thinks that a whole lot of studies pointing in the same direction is better evidence than only one. I Point out that it’s because those studies are all defined by the same person and run by the same people