4 ms·
That's the whole point, content only disappear from one ccTLD, but is still accessible from other places. It's similar to how the censorship works for the sear
by tonfa 14y ago
That's the whole point, content only disappear from one ccTLD, but is still accessible from other places. It's similar to how the censorship works for the search engine, it's usually limited to one ccTLD (e.g. nazi censorship only affects google.fr).
- nodata 14y agoSo the government is expected to say "well we can only block access to our TLD, so let's ignore the others?"
- tonfa 14y agoIt is more like the defendant shows that e.g. french users access the .fr domain and it would be disproportionate to block other TLDs (especially if it is legal elsewhere). (At least in the court cases I've seen in France) (btw it is not usually a government, but a court asking for this). It would be pretty bad if that wasn't the case, then everything would be censored to the least common denominator (India + Europe + Middle East + ...). Or companies wouldn't be able to operate in those countries.