3 ms·

holly fucking shit, you are SO patronizing. their comment is ok, and i fully understood their logic. I cannot say the same about yours.

by kome 2y ago

mistermann 2y ago
> holly fucking shit, you are SO patronizing. Perhaps (it is a subjective matter, in more ways than one, and some more importantly than others). What of it? Or another way of looking at it: which is more important in the big (geopolitical or otherwise) scheme of things...politeness (deceit, ignorance, rhetoric, etc) or truth/accuracy? Don't forget, lives are literally on the line. (Something else I find funny: sometimes lives being on the line is important, other times it is not. It is amazing how inconsistent humans are, even on the very most important matters.) > their comment is ok Is this to say that it suffers in no way regarding the specific phenomena that I am asking about? And if not: - what does "is ok" mean, precisely? - do you believe that it does not suffer in any of these ways? > and i fully understood their logic. If you did not, would you necessarily be able to know? (Can you realize the architectural problem you are in?) > I cannot say the same about yours. What specific "logic" of mine are you referring to here?
- CRConrad 2y ago
  > Or another way of looking at it: which is more important in the big (geopolitical or otherwise) scheme of things...politeness (deceit, ignorance, rhetoric, etc) or truth/accuracy? Not being a complete and utter asshole, like you are being here. HTH!
  - mistermann 2y ago
    For clarity: are you saying that not discussing the aspects of human culture I am drawing attention to objectively reduces unnecessary suffering and death on planet Earth? That exerting collective effort as a cultural convention to minimize self-reflection and awareness is more optimal gameplay? What does HTH stand for by the way?

3 ms·

holly fucking shit, you are SO patronizing. their comment is ok, and i fully understood their logic. I cannot say the same about yours.

by kome 2y ago

holly fucking shit, you are SO patronizing. their comment is ok, and i fully understood their logic. I cannot say the same about yours.

mistermann 2y ago
> holly fucking shit, you are SO patronizing. Perhaps (it is a subjective matter, in more ways than one, and some more importantly than others). What of it? Or another way of looking at it: which is more important in the big (geopolitical or otherwise) scheme of things...politeness (deceit, ignorance, rhetoric, etc) or truth/accuracy? Don't forget, lives are literally on the line. (Something else I find funny: sometimes lives being on the line is important, other times it is not. It is amazing how inconsistent humans are, even on the very most important matters.) > their comment is ok Is this to say that it suffers in no way regarding the specific phenomena that I am asking about? And if not: - what does "is ok" mean, precisely? - do you believe that it does not suffer in any of these ways? > and i fully understood their logic. If you did not, would you necessarily be able to know? (Can you realize the architectural problem you are in?) > I cannot say the same about yours. What specific "logic" of mine are you referring to here?
- CRConrad 2y ago
  > Or another way of looking at it: which is more important in the big (geopolitical or otherwise) scheme of things...politeness (deceit, ignorance, rhetoric, etc) or truth/accuracy? Not being a complete and utter asshole, like you are being here. HTH!
  - mistermann 2y ago
    For clarity: are you saying that not discussing the aspects of human culture I am drawing attention to objectively reduces unnecessary suffering and death on planet Earth? That exerting collective effort as a cultural convention to minimize self-reflection and awareness is more optimal gameplay? What does HTH stand for by the way?