3 ms·
I think that qualifies. 12 years of no freedom. Happy he finally gets to move on with his life. A real brave journalist who actually spoke truth to power.
by nemo44x 2y ago
I think that qualifies. 12 years of no freedom. Happy he finally gets to move on with his life. A real brave journalist who actually spoke truth to power.
- tivert 2y ago> I think that qualifies. 12 years of no freedom. It absolutely does not quality. Being on the lam is obviously not the same as serving time in custody. You can only sum up to 12 by making false equivalencies and ignoring important differences. It reeks of having a self-serving preordained conclusion (or being downstream from one) then distorting everything until it fits.