3 ms·
Linguistics isn't thought. I believe the author is specifically talking about a latent representation of conversation.
by ImHereToVote 2y ago
Linguistics isn't thought. I believe the author is specifically talking about a latent representation of conversation.
- tgv 2y agoFrom text. That connection has been investigated for a long time. Although I must admit, it isn't entirely clear what the author is talking about. It's a bit like thoughts that appear when one is somewhat intoxicated. But extracting a mathematical model from linguistic utterances is very much what linguistics is about (and hasn't been able to achieve). Perhaps rotating the representational space of an LLM suits his/her fancy.