4 ms·
Naturally. I'd suggest that - not in a hard-line way but in a soft centrism kinda way - there's certainly a core set of moral perspectives that one can really h
by contingencies 2y ago
Naturally. I'd suggest that - not in a hard-line way but in a soft centrism kinda way - there's certainly a core set of moral perspectives that one can really hold with any critical integrity, if really living with any awareness of one's surroundings, and many thinking people tend to converge on that set of morals through some avenue or other, and that tends to drive their take on the world above inane factors like nationalism and religion.
It's not a superior or single view per se, but it's probably a set of closely aligned views tempered by a greater breadth of thinking in terms of not being totally stuck in an isolate ghetto spacetime wallow / populist moshpit.
- lazyeye 2y agoYes I also think that everyone that disagrees with me is stupid and easily manipulated.... (not smart like me). Just expressing it in a few less words...
- contingencies 2y agoSo just to be clear: let's have a constructive discussion on the internet by assuming bad faith. Let me know how that goes for you. I'll stick to assuming ignorance, and await evidence to the contrary.
- lazyeye 2y agoWhen people make such wide-sweeping generalisations as you have, whilst flattering yourself at the same time, I dont immediately assume good faith. But as you say, I must be ignorant then (not smart and heroic like you).
- contingencies 2y agoCorrect. You're a fast learner.
- lazyeye 2y agoYep.