> So it basically does nothing at all? The effects on employment were much more pronounced than housing. The $1000/mo group went from 15% employment to 37%, an

> So it basically does nothing at all? The effects on employment were much more pronounced than housing. The $1000/mo group went from 15% employment to 37%, and the $50/mo group had no change in employment at all. It makes some sense: employment is probably more elastic to changes in financial status than housing. Just being able to afford transportation or a bit of occasional child care can immediately alter one's employment prospects.