5 ms·
> who exposed a so-called war hero as someone who actually committed war crimes. Worth mentioning that this wasn't David's intentions. He leaked the documents
by Hawxy 2y ago
> who exposed a so-called war hero as someone who actually committed war crimes.
Worth mentioning that this wasn't David's intentions. He leaked the documents as he thought special forces soldiers were being "unfairly" restricted via tighter rules of engagement & defense oversight in order to protect civilians. He wanted the ABC to tell everyone that special forces were being kept on too tight of a leash, not report on war crimes.
- berdario 2y agoWhat you're talking about is a smear campaign from ABC: https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/a-monumental-betrayal-four-corners-and-david-mcbride,18486 https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/a...
- SuperNinKenDo 2y agoThis story about McBride's motivations really only makes sense if you're motivated to come up with some kind of post facto reasoning for why McBride is a bad guy for leaking the documents, while ABC reporters are heroes for selectively publishing them. Never passed the pub test, thanks for the link.
- Hawxy 2y agoI'm not splitting hairs about if he's a (accidental) whistleblower or not (which is what that article seems to be about). He's never denied that his initial intentions for the documents were completely different than what transpired. "He told another media outlet at the time that it was a “different story to the one I wanted. They (ABC) published something about SAS soldiers shooting people by accident, which I found disappointing.”"
- lynx23 2y ago[flagged]