3 ms·
[Not OP] > So you're saying Chinese law applies to you when you're a US citizen in the US? Sometimes > We can't be subject to every country's laws, irrespect
by dlgeek 2y ago
[Not OP]
> So you're saying Chinese law applies to you when you're a US citizen in the US?
Sometimes
> We can't be subject to every country's laws, irrespective of citizenship or location.
No, that's why countries have extradition and other treaties that detail what foreign crimes they will recognize and provide reciprocity for with enforcement. Usually the answer is "Things that are also crimes in our country". Hacking is a crime in both countries, so Australian laws could be enforced on a US citizen through the mechanisms established by those treaties. Disparaging the CCP is explicitly protected in the US, so it wouldn't - so long as the US citizen never visits China.
- jiggawatts 2y agoWhich system did he hack? Before you answer, consider that his crime is the rough equivalent of you walking past a "secure government facility" with one of those number-pad locks on the door, trying a few combinations, and then giving up. Also, before talking about "attempted crimes are still crimes" or whatever, please do a rough Fermi estimate of how many teenage children do that much or worse on a daily basis, attempting to hack US systems from either abroad or on US soil. Should the government of the United States spend tens of millions of dollars prosecuting every such incident? Extradite every script kiddie and drag them in front a grand jury? Are you saying that there's "rules" here that are being meticulously followed by all parties? To most normal people, this looks like abuse of power. Assange made powerful people look bad and they retaliated with all of the tools at their disposal. That anyone here can justify this kind of behaviour is a sign that you want an emperor, not a president. A king, not an elected official. You want monarchy, with those in power able to execute a peasant for any infraction against their betters.