4 ms·
Being a short-order cook is a trade you can be trained for in a few shifts. Sure, you can get great at it over many years, but you're done learning most of what
by chefandy 2y ago
Being a short-order cook is a trade you can be trained for in a few shifts. Sure, you can get great at it over many years, but you're done learning most of what you need to learn in a year, tops. Working a station at a fine dining restaurant requires YEARS of knowledge built through experience, and usually, a culinary arts degree. That someone working a station in a Michelin starred restaurant wouldn't be as good at short-order cooking as an experienced short order cook is like judging an automotive engineer by comparing how quickly they do oil changes compared to a guy working at jiffy lube. Beyond that, those fine dining cooks have probably worked at paces that would make those short order cooks heads spin. Manhattan restaurants will easily do 500 covers on a weekend night and the amount of work that goes into each dish is absolutely incomparable. In the last fine dining place I worked in, one of my shifts was always in the pastry station-- those plates involved made-to-order tuiles, made-to-order sugar decorations, foams... and that all needs to be coordinated with everybody else in the kitchen. At a diner, they put stuff on a hot surface to make it hot and put it on a plate and the whole process takes about a minute, so you don't even have to talk to anyone, let alone calmly strategize while you're literally on fire. Those line cooks could walk into a diner and get dragged for the first two shifts by guys that have been cooking the same 15 dead simple dishes for a few years, and then by the third shift they'd be everybody's boss. One of those diner guys would walk into a michelin starred restaurant for a stage and ten minutes later, after failing to chop onions with the requisite precision, they'd be handed a mop or told to go home.
- willcipriano 2y agoIf every resturant was a michelin starred restaurant we couldn't feed everyone. The manner of working is very wasteful in terms of time and product. It's not a realistic service, they exist only for the very wealthy.
- chefandy 2y agoa) That is completely irrelevant. You're making assertions about those cooks skill level and it's just utterly false. b) Most fine dining restaurants use EVERYTHING they get. The roots from the herbs that get trimmed, the bones and scrap from the meat, the stale bread-- all have a purpose. Do you expect them to dye some clothes with the onion skins or save their burnt flatbread? Learning how to do that is a huge part of what you learn in a classical cooking education. You want to tackle food waste, look at distributors, grocery stores, cafeterias, and caterers, in that order. c) Those restaurants are selling a luxury product. In terms of economical efficiency, going to a diner doesn't hold a candle to eating rice and beans at home. Are you fundamentally against luxury products? Because your criticism applies to every handmade luxury product in existence. High-volume low-effort products will always be more economical. That doesn't mean they're more legitimate than better products. Not by a long shot.