12 ms·

> The point being that there is a extremely simple explanation for this accident Can you share that extremely simple explanation, if you know it?

• ajross 2y ago
  I just did. The tweeter is a two-pedal driver who leaned on the accelerator by accident, didn't realize it, and stomped on the brakes to stop the car. Then fibbed about it a little on Twitter for clicks. Why do you believe this one twitter user over me? Because one confirms your priors and the other doesn't.
  • jjav 2y ago
    > The tweeter is a two-pedal driver who leaned on the accelerator by accident, didn't realize it, That could be. > and stomped on the brakes to stop the car So, why didn't the car stop? Why did it keep driving forward with only one axle locked up by the brakes? > Why do you believe this one twitter user over me? Well because he was there and you were not.
    • ajross 2y ago
      > Why did it keep driving forward with only one axle locked up by the brakes? Again, you're citing facts not really in evidence. If you want to believe a two-tweet conspiracy without confirmation, I can't stop you. I'm saying that it's probably not the truth and that a routine loss of control is a better explanation.
      • jjav 2y ago
        > routine loss of control is a better explanation Loss of control is not routine. It is something that should never ever happen.
        • ajross 2y ago
          Did you miss the study I posted upthread which clearly says it's routine? "Should not" and "does" are not mutually exclusive.