3 ms·
I don't follow your calculations; It appears you're doing arithmetic with CAGRs from three different date ranges (2010-2020, 2012-2019, and L10Y). An apples-to
by verteu 2y ago
I don't follow your calculations; It appears you're doing arithmetic with CAGRs from three different date ranges (2010-2020, 2012-2019, and L10Y).
An apples-to-apples comparison illustrates my point:
L10Y cumulative change in:
Bay Area rent: +46.0% [0]
Bay Area wages: +45.7% [1]
Vs:
Barcelona rent: +70% (if we believe TFA)
Spain wages: +30% [2]
Or:
Cumulative 2010-2020 change in:
Bay Area rent: +57% [0]
Bay Area wages: +34% [1]
which also looks bad (but not as bad as Barcelona L10Y). Indeed, there were lots of complaints about housing costs in SF then.
[0] https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CUURA422SEHA https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CUURA422SEHA
[1] https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SMU06418840500000003 https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SMU06418840500000003
[2] https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=59150 https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=59150
- codemac 2y agoYeah I didn't have good data sources, and took shortcuts on the math. I guess it just doesn't look bad to me in terms of their real estate, thanks for pointing me to these better data sources.