4 ms·

He was morally justified in exposing war crimes.

• defrost 2y ago
  McBride? Exposing war crimes was an unintended self own for McBride. He was British Army (Northern Ireland) through and through, came out to Australia, failed to make the SASR and worked instead as an army lawyer. He leaked documents with the intent to "expose* how "increasingly restrictive Rules of engagement and the nature of investigations into members of the special forces" were making things worse for the poor squaddies doing their job. What happened was journalists looked into all his leaked documents and focused instead on the poor squadies kicking "bad guys" off cliffs, blooding new soldiers with execution kills, etc. His stated goal for leaking was to impede | stop investigations into war crimes: Justice David Mossop stated "the way you’ve explained it is that the higher-ups might have been acting illegally by investigating these people too much, and that that was the source of the illegality that was being exposed." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_McBride_(whistleblower) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_McBride_(whistleblower)
• scheme271 2y ago
  That's fine, what he's not morally justified in doing is publishing the material without vetting and exposing people in Afghanistan and Iraq to harm from islamic radicals.