> The 'piracy' element is running an activation script off of GitHub. You're modifying software against the terms of service to have functionality only offered

> The 'piracy' element is running an activation script off of GitHub. You're modifying software against the terms of service to have functionality only offered by an entirely different license that costs substantially more. Yeah, you're not downloading ISOs or using cracks but it is absolutely no less piracy. > However IMO that is Microsoft problem and not mine for not providing a legal way for a normal consumer to get LTSC. Sure, but that's their business decision and right. If you want it you can pay for it, just like if you want an expensive sportscar you have to pony up for that as well. > Given that there is no torrenting and it is just a script you are running, I am legitimately curious about any legal ramifications. For you individually, I'm sure you know they won't care, just as they already don't care about all the gamers with all the watermarked pirated versions of Windows. You're more than likely absolutely safe. But it's still just as much piracy as downloading an ISO and using a crack, and you would be just as legally culpable. > For me once I hit "most" and not "all" I asked myself why I was bothering, Honestly it's because Windows is still your enemy. You can tame it, but you have to fight with it. Sure, you can get it pretty good, and you eliminate a lot of problems using the ltsc version, but you still don't own the software and they could still fuck with it and by extension you and one day there might not be a script to fix it. Personally, I think it makes significantly more sense to keep windows around only to run the few games that won't work on Linux, not as a main OS. At this point, even the LTSC versions, are basically untrusted, hostile software. Everyone's has different views on this though, balancing conveience and other needs, so it's not like there's an objective answer.