5 ms·
No, typically these sorts of models would not be trained on reddit, they would be trained on historical data that insurance companies and lending companies have
by tensor 2y ago
No, typically these sorts of models would not be trained on reddit, they would be trained on historical data that insurance companies and lending companies have. For example, a famous case is where they used AI to help decide if people will reoffend [1]. The bias here was already embedded in prior historical data. E.g. there is a level of systemic racism or bias built-in to the entire prison system.
While HN is obsessed with LLMs, AI regulation targets more than just those systems. And yes, AI and machine learning were pervasive and used in a variety of useful settings long before these toy chat systems came about.
Insurance and lending companies already have complex algorithms and formula they use to determine risk scores. Adding components of these systems that are learned from data shouldn't change the overall oversight mechanisms required of them in my opinion.
[1] https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/01/21/137783/algorithms-criminal-justice-ai/ https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/01/21/137783/algorithm...
- doe_eyes 2y agoPeople are obsessed with LLMs because they can be applied to unstructured data and produce human-like outputs, so they are applicable to vastly more processes with vastly less oversight. The kinds of "AI" you're describing have been with us for decades, but LLMs and their ilk are a more consequential development. And if we're passing laws today, that's what they will be regulating for the most part.
- tensor 2y agoWhich is what I'm say is wrong. If the oversight on insurance and other companies is lacking, it needs to be improved across the board not just with lip service to the popular technology of the day. The bias inherent is the exist risk scoring systems is absolutely equally if not more consequential than LLMs. Most of these regulations can replace "AI" with "technology, mathematical model, or human processes" and they will be 1000x better laws.