3 ms·
This is a semantic argument, but defining "safety" as mitigation and prevention of harm is valid.
by WheatMillington 2y ago
This is a semantic argument, but defining "safety" as mitigation and prevention of harm is valid.
- akira2501 2y agoOf course it is, which is why I said "not a useful _mindset_." I'm not arguing the semantics, just suggesting that allowing yourself to use them may alter your behavior in negative ways.
- MengerSponge 2y agoIf the pandemic taught us anything (which it really, shockingly, didn't) it's that moral hazard is less of a risk than Chicago School economists would have you think. Introducing mechanisms to keep people safer rarely yields the feared perverse behavior, so just introduce the bit of safety and keep a wary eye out for the perverse behavior.
- brewdad 2y agoDriver behaviors once the risk of being stopped by a police officer went away during the pandemic beg to differ. Many of those misbehaviors continue today as new habits even after enforcement has resumed to varying degrees.