3 ms·
For me my windows setups are dedicated gaming devices, nothing more. Any general computing I do (with some random exceptions due to convenience) is on my Mac.
by nerdjon 2y ago
For me my windows setups are dedicated gaming devices, nothing more. Any general computing I do (with some random exceptions due to convenience) is on my Mac.
So for me the number one priority is performance and compatibility. Which as far as proton has come, using the LTSC version on Windows easily wins on compatibility (especially once you leave Steam) and in some cases wins on performance.
LTSC also drastically reduces the metrics sent back to Microsoft.
- metadat 2y agomacOS does offer a nicer overall UX than Windows, but the amount of telemetry Apple machines constantly stream to home base is disturbing. And unlike windows, I don't know of a way to turn it off. If you run Wireshark on any Mac you will observe the high volume of requests to Apple-owned IPs. Even when the machine is otherwise idle. It's creepy. On the other hand, Linux machines don't default to sending telemetry. P.s. Ubuntu is an exception to this rule which is one reason I'll never use Ubuntu again (they've included telemetry and embedded ads in the past). Debian and Pop_os both work remarkably well for desktop use these days.
- DEADMINCE 2y ago> macOS does offer a nicer overall UX than Windows, Eh, does it? I find it to be incredibly unintuitive, and so do many people I see try to use it with no prior PC experience.
- metadat 2y agoIt's hard to compete with what Win2k offered. That seems like it was the ultimate in intuitive, user-friendly, and stable.
- DEADMINCE 2y agoFunnily enough, I ran 2003 and then 2008 server versions as my desktop for a long time. No cruft and great performance. Very easy to enable desktop stuff and disable server stuff also.