One site I like a lot is https://mriquestions.com/index.html https://mriquestions.com/index.html It has a really interesting navigation where there's an articl

One site I like a lot is https://mriquestions.com/index.html https://mriquestions.com/index.html It has a really interesting navigation where there's an article, links to related articles, and references etc. Part of what I really like about it is the format of having the main text and then an "Advanced Discussion" accordion at the bottom that can be folded out for more detail. It's not uniformly used across all pages but I do like the format a lot. It's sort of an alternative to sidenotes but less disjoint where it treats the first part of a page as the intro and then expands in detail directions. It lets the intro be a higher-level and then "corrected" below. Example (just one I found, there are better ones but not all pages have them): https://mriquestions.com/how-to-reduce-sar.html https://mriquestions.com/how-to-reduce-sar.html Anyway just chiming in that it's a microfeature that I like vs say wikipedia which can just be... massively overwhelming on some pages. I don't necessarily think this feature is fully realized at mriquestions, but the MRI field suffers from multiple audiences (radiologists, technologists, engineers, etc) and its really difficult to pull content together that foster communication between these groups. mriquestions is by a radiologist so its a bit lacking on the engineering details side but its still pretty good but higher-level technologists use it well to get beyond the lies we tell them. It doesn't really get too far into the lies we tell radiologists though but sometimes it gets close (by lies I mean oversimplifications) and usually the references are good for the technical details.