3 ms·
ONE of her beeves is indeed based on this, but I believe she has also sued Apple for unrelated labor related issues. I agree that the EPA's report is based on
by microtherion 2y ago
ONE of her beeves is indeed based on this, but I believe she has also sued Apple for unrelated labor related issues.
I agree that the EPA's report is based on first hand observations; OTOH I would not characterize the findings quite the same way she did. There certainly were a significant number of violations, but I don't have the context of knowing how many such violations are found in other facilities of comparable size (e.g. placing a waste container on a stack without immediately labeling it, or not having all labels in a stack be readable without rearranging containers). The regulations certainly seem sensible, but I wonder whether there are really any facilities of a certain size that manage to run without any violations whatsoever.
- cool_dude85 2y agoIf I'm working and living next to a place with a ton of EPA violations around weird chemicals that may be dangerous, what good is it to me whether some other company elsewhere has a similar number of violations?
- microtherion 2y agoYes, but the question to me is how dangerous the dangerous is. As a comparison, if you look at a single health inspection for a single restaurant, e.g.: https://stgencep.sccgov.org/sccdineout/INSPECTIONREPORT_DADWSNBPG.pdf https://stgencep.sccgov.org/sccdineout/INSPECTIONREPORT_DADW... is that a safe place to eat or not? Do you insist on only eating in restaurants that have a score of 100?