3 ms·
the coincidence between the author and the "atleast" date simply means there's not enough evidence before that date. Dealing with EPA and other pollution contro
by cyanydeez 2y ago
the coincidence between the author and the "atleast" date simply means there's not enough evidence before that date. Dealing with EPA and other pollution control agencies will tell you very much they dont want to get into these situations because it makes them look bad.
It likely was happening way before this and the EPA could likely pinpoint the exact date based on simple log entries, but they won't stick their neck out farther than corroboration goes.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- Aurornis 2y agoWhat do you mean they don’t want to? Their job is to report the facts in a legally consistent manner, not imagine what might have happened.
- cyanydeez 2y agoit's not imagination to look at log books and say "well, they weren't reporting things here that they were reporting there". Thats not imagination. However, they're simply following up the "corroboration" part. Because someone identified a problem, _now_ they have to be a detective. I'd posit, _it is their job_ to find incriminating evidence and thus enforcement. In many places, they are not doing this. They are purely reactive. Thats my point; has nothing to do with imagination.