There are a series of overlooked axioms in that train of thought, in that: - All people involved are capable of learning skills outside of their knowledge doma

There are a series of overlooked axioms in that train of thought, in that: - All people involved are capable of learning skills outside of their knowledge domain as quickly as those inside those domains (People interchangeability) - All people involved won't have ideological splits for the direction of the company - That everyone involved wants to partake in the risks of ownership (market uncertainties/shifts, illiquid buyout scenarios, dealing with ownership transfer headaches, new incoming co-owners, ownership dilution, etc.) - That there is time outside of their work to manage the overhead of this co-op - That the talent required to ease their workloads is receptive to the co-op concept, or cheap enough to hire (not likely) in cases where they just want a stable income (see point 3) - That the decision overhead from the co-op is lower than the standard corporate structure (possible, & likely the easiest axiom to fulfill out of the list, if the time of the co-owners is cheaper) The author of the post responded to a similar question made earlier: Certain mental, financial, & cultural logistics are just not there/available given the time-frame involved. The co-op ideal is wonderful, but it requires a series of fulfillments that not everyone is as receptive towards. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40766367 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40766367