This is a very poorly titled article, by BBC no less. Tupac is merely mentioned twice, while everything else is about Generative AI. I'm not sure the relevanc

This is a very poorly titled article, by BBC no less. Tupac is merely mentioned twice, while everything else is about Generative AI. I'm not sure the relevance of Sheryl Crow to have much to say about Tupac when there are clearly people from his estate already dealing with things who might have a more insightful perspective than an artist and a journalist looking for clicks and eyeballs.