4 ms·
The two situations are not alike. People choose not to throw rocks directly as the action is direct, immediate and likely against the law with all the things th
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
The two situations are not alike. People choose not to throw rocks directly as the action is direct, immediate and likely against the law with all the things that it would influence. On the other hand, we have a remote system capable of dropping things on unsuspecting heads in an automated manner.
Do you really not see the difference?
- CyberDildonics 2y agoOne is easy an people don't do it, while one is complicated and people don't do it. You could drop stuff from a drone or have a drone shoot a gun too, but people don't want to hurt other people in general. What scenario is in your head that you think being able to drop something and hurt or kill someone is going to happen more if people can do it automatically? Who are these people that aren't hurting anyone but are suddenly going to do it once it becomes a science project?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- A4ET8a8uTh0 2y agoI had a longer post and deleted it. We disagree. Lets leave it at that.
- CyberDildonics 2y agoThere is no evidence or explanation here, you seem to just be saying that if people can hurt other people with some sort of automation they will, but you're not explaining why that would be or giving any examples of it happening.