> That's not at all what the parent comment is saying. That's what I'm saying. It's how discussion works, he said one thing, I said something different. > Als

> That's not at all what the parent comment is saying. That's what I'm saying. It's how discussion works, he said one thing, I said something different. > Also, such materials are real. Real but not feasible for any reason. The other commenter didn't give any info that would deny that. You didn't, too. I don't blame you, it would take non trivial amount of time and money to just understand if an idea doesn't work out in real world. Maybe manufacturing too expensive, maybe there's some blocking regulation, maybe health hazards for workers, environmental hazards... But yeah of course a random guy on HN knows for sure it's the IP law that's always ruining things. Who would care about potential drawbacks of some tech, we got PFAS into blood of probably everyone now so why stop there?