3 ms·
When I was a network guy I used to argue more in favor of letting everything we could over the internet. it was cheaper than the various private circuits, and
by dec0dedab0de 2y ago
When I was a network guy I used to argue more in favor of letting everything we could over the internet. it was cheaper than the various private circuits, and more reliable than VPNs.
Then when I started programming I realized we can’t trust programmers to do anything safely. And I wanted to airgap everything, but ofcourse that’s ridiculous.
So while we should assume all endpoints are open to the internet, I don’t think we should actually let them be. That would be madness.
does anyone expect every printer and network managed light fixture to stay up to date and vulnerability free? Even if it does, do we trust the vendors to not start spying on their customers?
I suspect this was mostly about selling the enterprise on saas/the cloud/google office. And it worked.
- p_l 2y agoNo, this is more about removing the idea that there is any safe network. Don't assume internal network (or leased circuits or whatever) are secure. Make smallest possible security perimeters - on servers you design/deploy, that would be often the server or even specific applications. With devices you can't secure better (like printers etc.) make small islands that can talk only with appropriate gateway device. etc. etc.