4 ms·
I'll answer but I don't think you want one/it... They're different. That's why. Simple. One you're giving them information/still seeing ads The other, they're
by bravetraveler 2y ago
I'll answer but I don't think you want one/it... They're different. That's why. Simple.
One you're giving them information/still seeing ads
The other, they're guessing and you're free from the mind rot. Distance surely hurts their accuracy.
Can't stop them guessing but you can stop being their authoritative source. You've heard the whole, "we're in charge of our response, not the problem", right?
- scubbo 2y agoThat's a great answer, thank you! Yeah, "someone non-consensually has low-accuracy information on me" is experientially different than "someone is using (more-accurate) information on me to serve me ads". The former's still not _great_ (they can still pass that information to other people which could lead to bad experiences), but it's still much better than the latter. Thanks for the clarification!