3 ms·
Has been heavily worked on in python 3.12 and up, don’t count out python just yet :)
by EasyMark 2y ago
Has been heavily worked on in python 3.12 and up, don’t count out python just yet :)
- Sesse__ 2y agoSpoiler alert: Software doesn't jump from “uses one core” to “efficiently uses 192 cores” once you remove the first lock.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- merb 2y agowell back in the days when somebody invented gunicorn it was basically running one worker per core, if the software allowed it. thus you at least could scale on the process level, which of course was super slow if you only had like 10 req/s on a 60 cores machine.
- EasyMark 2y agoNever said it did. I assume you know that at least a few people on here have a basic grasp on multiprocessors, locks, threads, asynch, etc
- Havoc 2y agoYeah not actually an issue for me. I run into skill limitations with python long before 100 core issues.