4 ms·
> Please don't assume that everyone who is pro-nuclear is anti-solar It's more that there is a rabid pro-nuclear segment who will try and silence anything less
by jmyeet 2y ago
> Please don't assume that everyone who is pro-nuclear is anti-solar
It's more that there is a rabid pro-nuclear segment who will try and silence anything less than unfettered praise for nuclear. Anecdotally, I can simply mention the bojective fact that the clean up for Fukushima will likely approach or even exceed $1 trillion [1] and I know what reaction I'll get.
The same goes for pointing out the very real problem of neutron energy loss from fusion (let alone the resulting destruction of the containment vessel) to the point where I'm not convinced fusion will ever be commercially viable and you get the same reaction.
So I can't speak to you personally but as a whole the nuclear fanboys, even on HN, absolutely do not tolerate even mild factual criticism or objective facts that paint nuclear in anything less than a glowing light (pun intended).
[1]:https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Fukushima-Anniversary/Fukushima-cleanup-costs-swell-with-no-end-in-sight https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Fukushima-Anniversary/Fuku...
- EasyMark 2y agoI’ve generally just asked someone to show me an analysis where wind/solar can handle something like a cold snap or time when wind basically doesn’t happen for days on end? Just go without power?There are currently so grid scale batteries that can go days without “good” conditions where your solar/wind are only performing at 20% rather than 60-70% ? If wind/solar is 80% of your mix you’re gonna have a bad time. Do you keep the old fossil fuel plants around “just in case”?who is going to pay for that?