4 ms·
> Only true if the commit author doesn't do so, and it is trivial to do so, either during or after a rebase using the rebase exec command. So given this is a di
by Nullabillity 2y ago
> Only true if the commit author doesn't do so, and it is trivial to do so, either during or after a rebase using the rebase exec command. So given this is a discipline issue no different from a developer authoring a change without testing it, I fail to see how this is "rebase"'s fault.
"Undisciplined enough to use rebase, disciplined enough to put in extra effort to mitigate some of the harms of rebase" is an imaginary intersection.
> Go right ahead :)
git log --first-parent
- lolinder 2y agoThis is begging the question (the fallacy, not the colloquial expression). It's only undisciplined to rebase if it's a bad practice, which is the topic under consideration here. You can't use your preferred answer to the debate as justification for dismissing your opponent's arguments.