3 ms·
> in martial arts you have even more stances, rotation around more axes and arrhythmic moves. I wonder how true this is. Specifically I think you could simplif
by viraptor 2y ago
> in martial arts you have even more stances, rotation around more axes and arrhythmic moves.
I wonder how true this is. Specifically I think you could simplify the moves into steps with "who hits who" states. You could normalise out the rhythm, following the "everything's in 4/4 if you don't count like a nerd" idea.
So you'd end up with just the key frames of either contacts/impact or change of the movement direction. Would martial arts really have even more variety here?
- fzeindl 2y ago> Would martial arts really have even more variety here? It depends, but yes. Martial arts is not just boxing. Take the following choreography from one style of Pencak silat: https://youtu.be/8H0x1AKlpM4?si=QJLNffTUozn9kCf9 https://youtu.be/8H0x1AKlpM4?si=QJLNffTUozn9kCf9
- viraptor 2y agoI'm experienced with both sides here. I think they're fairly comparable in moves/complexity if you include the non-partnered dances in general.