2 ms·
Of course there are mistakes. But still fewer than with other sources of evidence. DNA evidence is also trusted by default and yet: https://www.science.org/co
by scotty79 2y ago
Of course there are mistakes. But still fewer than with other sources of evidence.
DNA evidence is also trusted by default and yet:
https://www.science.org/content/article/forensics-gone-wrong-when-dna-snares-innocent https://www.science.org/content/article/forensics-gone-wrong...
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/investigation-finds-colorado-dna-analyst-intentionally-manipulated-dat-rcna142541 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/investigation-finds-col...
- smogcutter 2y agoYou’re missing the point. Of course there are (enormous, life-ruining) mistakes, but that’s not it. With software, generally the only people with the means to demonstrate the software is flawed are the people in control of the software and associated data.