2 ms·
Good response if the argument was natural == good, but it's not. Lighting coal on fire is also bad. Coal didn't suddenly zap into existence and then to global p
by llamaimperative 2y ago
Good response if the argument was natural == good, but it's not. Lighting coal on fire is also bad. Coal didn't suddenly zap into existence and then to global prevalence in air, food, and water within decades.
- lazide 2y agoThe argument is that burying things like plastics in a landfill is better than natural equivalents. Which you still seem impossibly locked into ignoring.