4 ms·
Why we would ever equate humanity's creative response to art and a machine's rote ingestion of data into mechanical output? Morally, legally, socially, these a
by emseetech 2y ago
Why we would ever equate humanity's creative response to art and a machine's rote ingestion of data into mechanical output?
Morally, legally, socially, these are entirely different.
- petermcneeley 2y agoCurrently ingestion has been proven to be legal. https://www.theverge.com/2024/2/13/24072131/sarah-silverman-paul-tremblay-openai-chatgpt-copyright-lawsuit https://www.theverge.com/2024/2/13/24072131/sarah-silverman-...
- emseetech 2y agoNever said it should be illegal, it should be treated differently in a legal framework.
- petermcneeley 2y agoIt was simply a footnote.
- krapp 2y agoBecause there's money to be made by granting AI an equivalent legal status to human beings (which negates many copyright issues) and by normalizing the output of AI as being equivalent to that of human beings. None of this is about the science. All of it is about the money.