4 ms·
I thought recently, we knew AI programs where coming along time ago. They were coming for accounting, repetitive corporate jobs. Having seen/listened to the te
by dav43 2y ago
I thought recently, we knew AI programs where coming along time ago. They were coming for accounting, repetitive corporate jobs.
Having seen/listened to the technology at the heart of AI (caveat, I don’t program and am looking from a mile high) I find it interesting the link I see.
The jobs where randomnesss and errors are at part of success - art, writing, creativity - this is where AI has impact first.
The jobs where accuracy is paramount and errors not tolerated - medicine, etc - maybe that’s where we see impact last if at all.
Just a reflection.
*edit spelling late at night
- SoftTalker 2y agoYes it's ironic, AI was supposed to free us from drudgery and give us time to spend on creative passions. Instead AI is taking over all the creative work and leaving only the drudgery. I'll be interested in AI when it can clean my house and do my laundry.
- dsr_ 2y agoIt's doing the creative work badly, which I find particularly interesting. It's recapitulating the best criticism of the original Marxist definition of value: value is not labor added to materials, value is quality improvements to those materials.
- lukas099 2y agoIs it actually taking over all the creative work? I haven’t seen any signs that it is
- SoftTalker 2y agoIt's doing passable pop music, art, and writing already, and still improving.
- lukas099 2y agoWhat I'm trying to get at is that musicians are still music'ing. We just also now have musicians that we didn't have before who are using these new tools.