Why is he talking about 1% of gun owners waging a no holds barred terrorist campaign against the US as if it's a good thing that somehow proves gun control supp

Why is he talking about 1% of gun owners waging a no holds barred terrorist campaign against the US as if it's a good thing that somehow proves gun control supporting Democrats wrong? And claiming that the real number would be closer to one third or half of all gun owners? And that most of them will be cops and soldiers? > Usually if they’re talking about soldiers, it’s about how they’re evil baby killers, or time bombs of PTSD rage, or poor deluded fools who joined the military because they couldn’t get a real job…. And cops, it’s about how they’re just a bunch of trigger happy racists just itching for an excuse to execute everybody who looks different than they do. Why is he upset at this description when he's just finished claming that if you pass a law on gun control these very people will start murdering people en masse?