3 ms·

I'm not sure who you are being sarcastic about in the end, but yes, Wayland is indeed clean and simple enough to not particularly discourage alternative impleme

I'm not sure who you are being sarcastic about in the end, but yes, Wayland is indeed clean and simple enough to not particularly discourage alternative implementations.

sylware 2y ago
Huh. Indeed, we agree. We just need to do the hardest part: keep it clean and simple to not particularly discourage alternative implementations... on the long run.
- ahartmetz 2y ago
  ...while also doing what users want and expect.
  - sylware 2y ago
    ... while avoiding their tantrums which will most likely destroy that "clean and simple".
    - immibis 2y ago
      "tantrums" is when you expect windows to be delineated with borders apparently. You got the Wayland attitude down pat: are we the problem? No, it's the users who are wrong!
      - sylware 2y ago
        This does not concern wayland, this is a user choice, the choice of a wayland compositor.
- immibis 2y ago
  For example, it's vitally important that wayland resists adding features like title bars, window icons, resize handles, desktop icons, or mouse cursors. These frivolous features have no place in a serious desktop environment! They are only bloat!